Jim McElwee: “Before I retired two years ago, one of my plans was to spend my time managing our money rather than handing one or two per cent to a financial planner or institution for the same task. Fortunately, before I could foul things up, I read enough of your stuff to convince me that the same principles (careful allocations and low-cost funds) that had carried me to relative financial security were the very principles I needed in retirement. I’m much more of a bicyclist now and much less of a hands-on-each-day investor. Thanks.”
Nice to hear.
Nothing against the folks who would take 1% or 2% of your assets each year; but what too few people understand is that, in the normal course of things, 1% or 2% of your assets is easily 10% or 20% of your expected return — especially if, as is often the case, that 1% or 2% is not deductible.
What if I told you that for just 1.5% of its value each year, I would advise you (with no guarantees of being right) on whether to sell, hold or refinance your home. On a $200,000 house, that would be a $3,000 annual fee . . . rising as your home appreciated, and then doubling if you bought a second home. Are you rushing for your checkbook to send me the first $3,000? No? Well, it’s pretty much the same thing.
Quote of the Day
Shrouds have no pockets. (There's no luggage rack on a hearse.)~. . . as they say
Request email delivery
- Jun 24:
Something Else Democrats Stand For
- Jun 21:
What Do Democrats Stand For?
- Jun 20:
- Jun 19:
A Letter From Thor
- Jun 18:
How The FBI +Used+ To Spend Its Time
- Jun 17:
“Outrageous Congressional Perks”
- Jun 13:
What’s Wrong With That Zucchini???
- Jun 12:
Food Rescue Dot Org
- Jun 11:
Has Morgan Freeman Gone Too Far?
- Jun 10:
Did He Leave?
- Jun 24: