But first . . .
Treat yourself to the opening segment of yesterday’s Morning Joe.
It doesn’t get any better than this.
SFT: “Professor Aaron Tang argues that Constitutional law is broken because it lacks a coherent principle for deciding hard cases. Textualism tends to favor “conservatives”; evolutionism (the “living constitution”), tends to favor liberals; and these two principles are simply irreconcilable. He discerns a possibly emerging principle in the past term’s surprises, consistent with the Court’s proper role as a moderating influence, which he calls the ‘least harm’ principle.”
A perspective worth considering.
Have a great weekend!
