THE DEATH TAX
Sean O’Donnell: ‘The (relatively non-partisan) policy wonks in have beaten the issue of death taxes to, well death, and the conclusion is nearly unanimous that the compliance cost of this tax (the cost to the public and private sector of administering the tax) and the cost as a result of economic decisions being made to avoid the tax are greater than the revenue.’
☞ Economic decisions like huge grants to charity? One of the unintended consequences of ending the tax, I fear, would be a huge blow to charitable giving. I do agree it would be wise to simplify the tax and close the loopholes. Also, probably to raise the exemption to $5 million, so it would really apply to only a tiny handful of fortunate families – who, even after throwing in some of their chips at the end of the game, would have to be considered winners.
There is a provocative piece in The Nation which I think merits part of your weekend. It has nothing to do with money, only your nation. The Nation, as many of you know, is proudly liberal in its orientation, which instantly closes some minds.
Give it a shot anyway, and then send me your thoughts. The only line of objection I rule out out is the line that goes ‘this topic is not fit for public discourse.’ Quite the contrary, this topic is called ‘American History,’ and it will be taught and debated for years to come.
Quote of the Day
Market economics as currently practiced often ... includes only what's countable, not what counts.~Rocky Mountain Institute
Request email delivery
- Mar 21:
Demand Your Carbon Dividend
- Mar 20:
Success! Why Do New York’s Mayor And City Council Resist It?
- Mar 19:
The Other Kind Of Bankruptcy
- Mar 18:
- Mar 15:
Pete Buttigieg And John Delaney
- Mar 14:
The Fifth Risk
- Mar 13:
Reader Feedback: How About A Stock Update?
- Mar 12:
Eat Drink And Be Merry? . . .
- Mar 10:
Three Podcasts And Those Calls From Belarus
- Mar 8:
How Arthur Finkelstein Ruined The World
- Mar 21: