There was a short column yesterday, holiday notwithstanding.  Click here and live forever. (“But why would anyone want to?” one of you asks tomorrow.)

Today, two things:

WISCONSIN

As usual, Krugman nails it. God bless the New York Times:

February 20, 2011
Wisconsin Power Play
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Last week, in the face of protest demonstrations against Wisconsin’s new union-busting governor, Scott Walker – demonstrations that continued through the weekend, with huge crowds on Saturday – Representative Paul Ryan made an unintentionally apt comparison: ‘It’s like Cairo has moved to Madison.’

It wasn’t the smartest thing for Mr. Ryan to say, since he probably didn’t mean to compare Mr. Walker, a fellow Republican, to Hosni Mubarak. Or maybe he did – after all, quite a few prominent conservatives, including Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Rick Santorum, denounced the uprising in Egypt and insist that President Obama should have helped the Mubarak regime suppress it.

In any case, however, Mr. Ryan was more right than he knew. For what’s happening in Wisconsin isn’t about the state budget, despite Mr. Walker’s pretense that he’s just trying to be fiscally responsible. It is, instead, about power. What Mr. Walker and his backers are trying to do is to make Wisconsin – and eventually, America – less of a functioning democracy and more of a third-world-style oligarchy. And that’s why anyone who believes that we need some counterweight to the political power of big money should be on the demonstrators’ side.

Some background: Wisconsin is indeed facing a budget crunch, although its difficulties are less severe than those facing many other states. Revenue has fallen in the face of a weak economy, while stimulus funds, which helped close the gap in 2009 and 2010, have faded away.

In this situation, it makes sense to call for shared sacrifice, including monetary concessions from state workers. And union leaders have signaled that they are, in fact, willing to make such concessions.

But Mr. Walker isn’t interested in making a deal. Partly that’s because he doesn’t want to share the sacrifice: even as he proclaims that Wisconsin faces a terrible fiscal crisis, he has been pushing through tax cuts that make the deficit worse. Mainly, however, he has made it clear that rather than bargaining with workers, he wants to end workers’ ability to bargain.

The bill that has inspired the demonstrations would strip away collective bargaining rights for many of the state’s workers, in effect busting public-employee unions. Tellingly, some workers – namely, those who tend to be Republican-leaning – are exempted from the ban; it’s as if Mr. Walker were flaunting the political nature of his actions.

Why bust the unions? As I said, it has nothing to do with helping Wisconsin deal with its current fiscal crisis. Nor is it likely to help the state’s budget prospects even in the long run: contrary to what you may have heard, public-sector workers in Wisconsin and elsewhere are paid somewhat less than private-sector workers with comparable qualifications, so there’s not much room for further pay squeezes.

So it’s not about the budget; it’s about the power.

In principle, every American citizen has an equal say in our political process. In practice, of course, some of us are more equal than others. Billionaires can field armies of lobbyists; they can finance think tanks that put the desired spin on policy issues; they can funnel cash to politicians with sympathetic views (as the Koch brothers did in the case of Mr. Walker). On paper, we’re a one-person-one-vote nation; in reality, we’re more than a bit of an oligarchy, in which a handful of wealthy people dominate.

Given this reality, it’s important to have institutions that can act as counterweights to the power of big money. And unions are among the most important of these institutions.

You don’t have to love unions, you don’t have to believe that their policy positions are always right, to recognize that they’re among the few influential players in our political system representing the interests of middle- and working-class Americans, as opposed to the wealthy. Indeed, if America has become more oligarchic and less democratic over the last 30 years – which it has – that’s to an important extent due to the decline of private-sector unions.

And now Mr. Walker and his backers are trying to get rid of public-sector unions, too.

There’s a bitter irony here. The fiscal crisis in Wisconsin, as in other states, was largely caused by the increasing power of America’s oligarchy. After all, it was superwealthy players, not the general public, who pushed for financial deregulation and thereby set the stage for the economic crisis of 2008-9, a crisis whose aftermath is the main reason for the current budget crunch. And now the political right is trying to exploit that very crisis, using it to remove one of the few remaining checks on oligarchic influence.

So will the attack on unions succeed? I don’t know. But anyone who cares about retaining government of the people by the people should hope that it doesn’t.

SOAP KITCHEN

Lisa Becker: ‘This past Christmas Day I was home cooking for my husband when I saw a news report about a grass roots organization operating here in Atlanta, the Global Soap Project. It was founded by a man named Derreck Kayongo. He and his family fled from Uganda during Idi Amin’s terror in the late 70’s. Derreck has since become successful. He was staying in a hotel when he saw a housekeeper throw away a bar of soap that had been used once. He saw an opportunity. The Global Soap Project has organized literally dozens of hotels, first in Atlanta, then around the country, to save those used bars of soap. They are shipped to a warehouse here, sanitized, and formed into new bars of soap. They are then shipped to refugee camps and to displaced people around the world. . . . As a healthcare worker, I understand the importance of the act of someone washing their hands. I was immediately hooked, because I saw the bigger implications. The World Health Organization estimates that a child dies of a preventable disease every 30 seconds, simply because they can’t cleanse themselves. If a mother can cleanse herself before she breast feeds her baby, if a family can wash their food before they eat it, to wash their kitchen utensils, to bathe, and wash their clothes – this is a project that has the possibility of saving lives and alleviating suffering. I will be present for this project for the long haul. . . . As a new volunteer, this is what I saw. The warehouse is small, located off of an access road behind a strip center. When you first walk in, first of all there is grated soap all over the floor. On one wall of the warehouse, there are literally piles of garbage bags full of soap ready to be processed. Volunteers like me work in shifts. To sanitize the soap, we scrape off the outside with a potato peeler. The clean soap is then grated, then put into a machine that looks like a giant pasta maker. The machine melts the soap, then forms it into one long bar of soap at the end of the machine. The soap is cut into generously sized bars, then packaged into crates, ready to ship. . . . Derreck has told me that he has to be very careful about shipping the bars. In those parts of the world, products like ours can end up on the black market, so he only uses volunteer organizations that he trusts, like Amnesty International. (Derreck told me that he once followed a Global Soap shipment to a refugee camp in Africa. When the mothers in the village saw what had been brought to them, they were so overjoyed they danced in the street.) . . . I also saw as a new volunteer that this organization is a grass roots as they come, working on a shoe string budget. Derreck pays for the warehouse himself. They had a wish list for supplies a mile long that wasn’t being met. In honor of Charles, that organization will never want for anything again. I worked a Global Soap shift today and had to make two trips in my car to bring in all of the supplies. It will take me time, the list is long. . . . Isn’t it funny how so many things are connected? Because your book helped my husband and me 20 years ago, we have the money to do things like this. . . . My husband David and I are like peas and carrots. We adore each other, and there is going to be a time that we will have to face what you are right now. One being without the other. That’s why I like believing in an afterworld. Our bodies are just shells. We’re vulnerable. But there are some things that never die, like true love. No matter what, we’ll see each other later.’

 

Comments are closed.