Following up on yesterday’s discussion of this eternal question, Jeff Serenity (well, I’m guessing from his e-address — and hoping! — that’s his last name) notes that the ratio of the S&P 500 to the price of new homes over the past 36 years has never been more favorable for the ‘home’ side of the equation. “In other words,” he says, “it’s never taken so few ‘units’ of the S&P 500 to purchase a new home.”
So maybe this is a better time to buy real estate than stocks (or to buy Japanese stocks than US stocks, but that’s a whole different question/issue). And, Jeff suggests, it could be argued that one way to invest more in real estate, if you can’t actually afford another home, is to pay down a mortgage.
Well, yes and no. You’ve already bought the home; paying down the mortgage will not increase your real estate gains. When you pay it down, it’s not so much like buying more real estate as investing in a bond whose interest rate is precisely identical to the interest rate on your mortgage.
Still, I found the column by Dallas Morning News columnist Scott Burns from which Jeff drew this information to be just as interesting as Jeff did — http://www.scottburns.com/990119tu.htm . Thanks, Jeff! (Seinfeld fans: “Serenity now!”)
Quote of the Day
The art of acting consists of keeping people from coughing.~Sir Ralph Richardson
Request email delivery
- Mar 22:
Pins And Groats — Be It Ever Thus
- Mar 21:
Demand Your Carbon Dividend
- Mar 20:
Success! Why Do New York’s Mayor And City Council Resist It?
- Mar 19:
The Other Kind Of Bankruptcy
- Mar 18:
- Mar 15:
Pete Buttigieg And John Delaney
- Mar 14:
The Fifth Risk
- Mar 13:
Reader Feedback: How About A Stock Update?
- Mar 12:
Eat Drink And Be Merry? . . .
- Mar 10:
Three Podcasts And Those Calls From Belarus
- Mar 22: