As America gets less great by the minute — if only, literally, by infrastructure decay — what can be done prior to November 6, 2018?

[Part One: how YOU can be most effective]

Tips from a high-level Senate staffer (thanks, Michael and Tee):

You should NOT be bothering with online petitions or emailing. Online contact basically gets immediately ignored, and letters pretty much get thrown in the trash unless you have a particularly strong emotional story – but even then it’s rarely worth the time it took you to craft that letter.

There are two things that all Progressives should be doing all the time right now, and they’re by far the most important things:

1. The best thing you can do to be heard and get your congressperson to pay attention: if they have town halls, go to them. Go to their local offices. If you’re in DC, try to find a way to go to an event of theirs. Go to the “mobile offices” that their staff hold periodically (all these times are located on each congressperson’s website). When you go, ask questions. A lot of them. And push for answers. The louder and more vocal and present you can be at those the better.

2. But, those in-person events don’t happen every day. So, the absolute most important thing that people should be doing every day is calling. You should make 6 calls a day: 2 each (DC office and your local office) to your 2 Senators and your 1 Representative. Calls are what all the Congresspeople pay attention to. Every single day, the Senior Staff and the Senator get a report of the 3 most-called-about topics for that day at each of their offices (in DC and local offices), and exactly how many people said what about each of those topics. They’re also sorted by zip code and area code.

Republican callers generally outnumber Democrat callers 4-1, and when it’s a particular issue that single-issue-voters pay attention to (like gun control, or planned parenthood funding, etc…), it’s often closer to 11-1.

2a. When calling the DC office, ask for the Staff member in charge of whatever you’re calling about (“Hi, I’d like to speak with the staffer in charge of Healthcare, please”). Local offices won’t always have specific ones, but they might. If you get transferred to that person, awesome. If you don’t, that’s ok – ask for their name, and then just keep talking to whoever answered the phone. Don’t leave a message (unless the office doesn’t pick up at all – then you can…but it’s better to talk to the staffer who first answered than leave a message for the specific staffer in charge of your topic).

2b. Give them your zip code. They won’t always ask for it, but make sure you give it to them, so they can mark it down. Extra points if you live in a zip code that traditionally votes for them, since they’ll want to make sure they get/keep your vote.

2c. If you can make it personal, make it personal. “I voted for you in the last election and I’m worried/happy/whatever” or “I’m a teacher, and I am appalled by Betsy DeVos,” or “as a single mother” or “as a white, middle class woman,” or whatever.

2d. Pick 1-2 specific things per day to focus on. Don’t go down a whole list – they’re figuring out what 1-2 topics to mark you down for on their lists, so, focus on 1-2 per day. Ideally something that will be voted on/taken up in the next few days, but it doesn’t really matter…even if there’s not a vote coming up in the next week, call anyway. It’s important that they just keep getting calls.

2e. Be clear on what you want – “I’m disappointed that the Senator…” or “I want to thank the Senator for their vote on…” or “I want the Senator to know that voting in _____ way is the wrong decision for our state because…” Don’t leave any ambiguity.

2f. They may get to know your voice/get sick of you – it doesn’t matter. The people answering the phones generally turn over every 6 weeks anyway, so even if they’re really sick of you, they’ll be gone in 6 weeks. From experience since the election: If you hate being on the phone & feel awkward, don’t worry…there are a bunch of scripts (Indivisible has some). After a few days of calling, it starts to feel a lot more natural. Put the 6 numbers in your phone all under Politician, which makes it really easy to click down the list each day!

Now go get ’em!!  And share this with others!

That’s plenty for today — indeed, for the week, month, and year, if you actually do it! — but for those with an interest in out-of-the-box thinking . . .

[Part Two: an idea to make Congress more productive — even before we fix gerrymandering]

My friend Peter Kinzler recently published this in The Hill:How Just a Few Members of Congress Could Restore Regular Order.”

. . . The Congress used to work a five-day week. Members and sometimes their families socialized and got to know each other.  These inter-actions helped create the conditions for compromise. . . .

If the Congressional leadership is unwilling to restore the regular order that served it well historically, is there another way to do so?  The Constitution may hold part of the answer.  It states that a quorum for the Senate or the House must be present to do business. Both bodies get around it by assuming a quorum is present. . . .

There are, however, mechanisms to require an actual quorum. Under the Constitution and Senate rules, a single member can force 51 senators to come to the Senate chamber in order to continue business. The House has a higher requirement, but one that a small, determined minority could meet.

If members of Congress had to spend more time with their colleagues, the amount of real engagement might increase – and that could lead to more action on the people’s priorities. . . .

Nor could the Republicans just change the rules, says Peter.  The definition of a quorum resides in the Constitution.  And “were the Republicans to try to require more than one senator to raise the point of order, Democrats could accuse them of unconstitutional behavior, forcing them to explain to their constituents why they changed the rules so they wouldn’t have to do their jobs.”

The idea wouldn’t be to have a quorum sitting in each chamber at all times . . . just to require it when important issues were up for consideration — and frequently enough to get them used to actually working with each other.  Perhaps even getting to know each other.

It’s an interesting notion, anyway.

In the meantime, see Part One, above.



Comments are closed.