4TH QUARTERLY ESTIMATED TAX
Don’t forget to mail in your fourth quarterly 2010 estimated income tax today if you have appreciable income on which tax was not withheld. You’re excused from doing this if you file your full 2010 tax return by January 31, 2011.
And speaking of taxes …
How is it patriotic to be oppose paying taxes required to keep our nation healthy and strong?
TAX QUESTION – PART 2
Yes, of course, we’re all against the straw men – like $600 hammers and bridges to nowhere – that account for a negligible part of the budget.
But nonmilitary foreign aid? On both ethical grounds and as a way of winning hearts and minds (and, ultimately, markets), that line item, if you ask me, is significantly underfunded at less than 1% of our budget. And would make no appreciable difference even if we eliminated it.
Likewise, earmarks. If you assume they are entirely wasted – that they provide nothing of value for what they cost (which is a ridiculous assumption) – they, too, amount to less than 1% of our budget. Not where we should be focusing our attention.
The real places to get the budget in balance include our enormous military spending (don’t miss “The Tyranny of Defense Inc.” in the current Atlantic) . . . our health care system (on which at least we’ve made a start toward reform) . . . and our aversion to taxes.
I ask again: How is it patriotic to be oppose paying taxes required to keep our nation healthy and strong?
TAX QUESTION – PART 3
I was reading the 1941 budget the other day (more particularly, FDR’s transmittal message, submitted January 3, 1940) and came across this paragraph, headed National Defense Taxes:
I am convinced that specific tax legislation should be enacted to finance the emergency national defense expenditures. Although these expenditures appear unavoidable, they will not increase the permanent wealth-producing capacity of our citizens. I believe it is the general sense of the country that this type of emergency expenditure be met by a special tax or taxes. Moreover, this course will make for greater assurance that such expenditures will cease when the emergency has passed.
. . . I hope that the Congress will follow the accepted principle of good taxation of taxing according to ability to pay and will avoid taxes which decrease consumer buying power.
He concludes with the thought that the national debt he had racked up over the prior eight years was not a cause for alarm, because it had been used to build the nation’s infrastructure and its productive capacity (along with its morale).
He did not go on to say – but one can hardly read this today without thinking – that, obviously, you would never suffer an increase in the national debt for the purpose of lowering taxes for the rich.
(If this sounds familiar, it’s because I’ve lifted it from a column posted some years back. Thank you for noticing.)
MY FAVORITE DR. KING QUOTE
“If a man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great street sweeper who did his job well.”
Not one of his most famous passages, but it speaks to the dignity of the individual, and the respect we should have for ourselves and each other.
Quote of the Day
FOREIGN AID: Taxing poor people in rich countries for the benefit of rich people in poor countries.~Bernard Rosenberg
Request email delivery
- Apr 20:
Getting Your $4,000
- Apr 19:
Not About Trump
- Apr 18:
No Time For By-Standers
- Apr 17:
NYT: Not Above The Law
- Apr 14:
TED: Living Forever — And Making Bail
- Apr 13:
If Only We Had Listened
- Apr 11:
Can It Happen Here?
- Apr 10:
Greetings From Vancouver
- Apr 8:
Fascism: Not The Path we Want To Take
- Apr 8:
Fascism: Not The Path We Want To Take
- Apr 20: