Summer’s going too fast.
Doesn’t it always?
Steve Benoit: ‘Hit the F11 button when in your browser to see how it collapses the garbage at the top of your screen. It toggles back and forth. Love it. I can read most things without scrolling! Maybe you knew this tip, but I didn’t despite years of computer work.’
Joe Cherner: ‘Your article got it WRONG. The find function works WITHOUT typing ctrl-F. You simply type the first few letters of the word you are looking for. Firefox goes right to it.’
Well, you don’t literally see real-time traffic – the cars inching along. Just icons on the map. And you don’t see the actual Italian restaurants (or Japanese or Thai or . . . ), just clickable icons. But this is certainly worth a look.
Stephen Gilbert: ”To some, this story might be seen as evidence of evolution.’
☞ It seems elephants are becoming tuskless, because what used to be their defense has made them a target.
MARRIED TO AN FBI
Doug Jones: ‘A friend posted this:
By Beth Quinn
I was going to leave the gay marriage issue alone just to save myself some grief.
But then I thought, what fun would that be? Somebody’s got to irritate the self-righteous folks who tell the rest of us how to live, and it might as well be me.
You know who you are, so get your writing implements ready because you’ll want to damn me to hell by the time we’re done here.
For me, there is one central question in the whole gay marriage controversy: What do you care?
What difference does it make in your own life if two gays or lesbians get married? It simply mystifies me that you feel threatened by this. What possible harm could it do in your personal, little life whether the two guys living at the end of your block say “I do”?
I keep hearing the same pat answer from your prophets of doom – that allowing homosexuals to marry will “destroy the institution of marriage.”
Well I gotta’ tell you, a lot of gays and lesbians have been getting married lately, and so far my own institution of marriage is doing just fine. I checked. When I heard they were lining up for licenses, I asked my husband if he felt our marriage was going downhill on account of it. He just ignored the question and wanted to know what kind of perennials I thought we should plant.
I took that as a good sign. Perennials are an investment in the future, so I figure he’s sticking around despite what those homosexuals are doing.
So, self-righteous folks, I guess I’m wondering what’s wrong with your own marriages that you feel so threatened by another couple’s happiness. Are you unable to sustain a good sexual relationship, knowing that two gay guys are sleeping together in wedded bliss? Are you unable to have an intimate conversation with your spouse because you’re distracted by the notion of two women going off on a honeymoon?
Because if your marriage is that unstable, you should stop worrying about what others are doing and tend to your own problems before your divorce contributes to the decline of the institution of marriage.
I’ve given this a lot of thought, and I’ve completely failed to come up with ways that gay marriage will have an impact on your life. It won’t raise your taxes. It won’t cause the kid who shovels your driveway to quit. It won’t make your laundry dingy. It won’t alter the weather. It won’t cause your dog to start passing gas. It won’t affect your relationship with God. It won’t cause you to develop a tumor on your head.
Those of you who would talk about grand concepts like society and institutions and pillars and guideposts and moral fibers and whatnot, I say this is just your excuse for meddling. And history has shown us that nothing good ever comes of meddling in other people’s affairs. Every time Christians showed up to mess with heathens, for example, we just ended up with a lot of unhappy heathens with syphilis and smallpox.
Those of you who would point out that the dictionary definition of the word “marriage” involves a man and a woman, let me point out that the dictionary is a living, breathing document that changes as word usage changes. If you doubt it, look up the word “dot” in a current edition.
We the people get to decide what’s in the dictionary. The dictionary doesn’t get to dictate our societal conventions. Your hair isn’t going to catch on fire if the definition of marriage is eventually changed to read, “two consenting adults” instead of “man and woman.”
As for the Bible, which is always the last refuge for those of you who want to impose your will on us savages, we’re not all reading out of the same book. More fundamentally, the Bible is not a legal document. If it were, those who fail to love one another would be rounded up and thrown in jail. The prison budget would go through the roof what with all the new cells we’d be needing for the neighbor haters.
I have only this advice to offer those of you who oppose gay marriage: Don’t marry a homosexual.
If you’re a man and you don’t want to marry another man, for crying out loud, stick to your guns! That would be a terrible idea. You’d be miserable! Same for women. Marry someone of the opposite sex if that’s your personal preference.
After all, no one’s got the right to meddle in your private affairs.
☞ Nicely put. Yet I think she misses the real fear here: that if marriage equality is granted, kids may come to think it’s OK to be gay – and for a lot of reasons, parents would rather their kids be straight.
But if sexual orientation is not chosen – and, though I can’t speak for yours, mine sure wasn’t – then this fear is unfounded.
Doug responds: ‘Sexual orientation a choice? My somewhat limited understanding of DNA indicates otherwise. (Hey, I have a physics degree, some background in geophysics and petroleum engineering, and I work for civil engineers. What do I know about DNA?) I didn’t choose to be heterosexual, it just happened that way. Having a ‘minority’ for a partner (she’s Native American, or, as she prefers, FBI – Full Blooded Indian) has really taught me to accept people as people. Folks is folks. What I am convinced of is this. You, me and a bunch of white folks and persons of a zillion ‘minorities’ could gather in a room. The only thing present there would be a bunch of human beings with a whole lot of extremely closely related DNA with a few minor differences, each of which is beyond any person’s control. Too bad some people are unable to understand this.’
☞ Indeed. See you in August.
Quote of the Day
On the day of the 1983 economic summit, James A. Baker 3rd, then chief of staff, realized Mr. Reagan had not read his briefing book. When Mr. Baker asked why, Mr. Reagan responded, 'Well, Jim, The Sound of Music was on last night.'~Professor Herbert S. Parmet reviewing President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime
Request email delivery
- Mar 26:
iPhone Tips And The KGB
- Mar 25:
Of Deficits And That Mechanical Swan
- Mar 22:
Pins And Groats — Be It Ever Thus
- Mar 21:
Demand Your Carbon Dividend
- Mar 20:
Success! Why Do New York’s Mayor And City Council Resist It?
- Mar 19:
The Other Kind Of Bankruptcy
- Mar 18:
- Mar 15:
Pete Buttigieg And John Delaney
- Mar 14:
The Fifth Risk
- Mar 13:
Reader Feedback: How About A Stock Update?
- Mar 26: