Michael Kinsley, as usual, says it best. Enjoy – Bill Bennett one more time. (Or, as Harry Mark put it to me in an e-mail: ‘Years ago, as DRUG CZAR, Bennett laughingly dismissed his three-pack-a-day nicotine addiction as no big deal. He also looks like he doesn’t miss too many meals. And he peddles moral hooey at $50K a pop to enable a gambling problem. Virtue? Self-control?’)
Greg Palast says it most urgently. Be troubled – could the right wing be as bad as he says? It seems so ungentlemanly to suggest the things he does. We’d rather not think any of these things. But if you read Blinded By the Right – David Brock’s apology for the rightwing conspiracy he was a central player in – it’s no great stretch to credit the deeply troubling allegations in Palast’s book, too.
John Snow, our Treasury Secretary, says it most spuriously – all over the Sunday morning talk shows yesterday. Be bearish. I have no transcript to link you to, but here’s what he says: What we need is the biggest possible tax cut, on top of the gigantic 2001 tax cut we already enacted. And no, we shouldn’t be worried about the giant budget deficit. That is something he used to decry. Not now. Now it’s imperative to give multi-millionaires a big tax cut – and average folks, little or nothing – because these multi-millionaires will go out and buy the refrigerators, SUV’s and gardening equipment they’ve been dreaming of but couldn’t afford … and that will spur demand and create jobs.
(You know, you can blame our weak economy on business cycles, if that’s what you believe – but on whom do you blame our weak Treasury Secretaries?)
Paul Krugman says it over and over again – and thank heavens he does. Even Tim Russert seems finally to be listening. Krugman gets the last word.
PS – Between Kinsley, Palast and Krugman, this is three columns in one, even if I didn’t write any of them. My contract calls for me to take tomorrow off.
Quote of the Day
The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.~Adam Smith, The Wealth Of Nations
Request email delivery
- Feb 15:
NYC. UK. Canada.
- Feb 14:
If Republican Officials Go To Prison . . .
- Feb 13:
The National Butterfly Center Is Taking A Stand
- Feb 12:
Home-Schooled For Christ. And Pence.
- Feb 11:
Russian TV Thanks The GOP (And Don’t Miss Bill Maher)
- Feb 9:
The Perfect Virginia Solution
- Feb 8:
The Case For A Better Wealth Tax
- Feb 7:
200 Times More Interest On Your Money . . .
- Feb 6:
Listen To A Structural Forensicist
- Feb 5:
Tom Brady’s Secret For Your Parents
- Feb 15: