Sorry: just an update today . . .
Guru writes of yesterday’s FDA panel: “The important vote on ETRM was 6 yes, 2 no, 1 abstain that benefit outweighs risk. That’s what we wanted. On safety, the vote was 8 yes, 1 no. On efficacy, however, the vote was 4 yes, 5 no. Yet the vote earlier in the day on whether the 18 month data supported efficacy was 9 yes 0 no. Doctors who earlier in the day had voted ‘yes’ that the 12- and 18-month data showed efficacy voted ‘no’ on the official ‘efficacy’ vote. Go figure. The FDA will approve their device in my opinion.”
Those of us who bought shares with money we truly can afford to lose await the decision — and the market’s reaction — with nervous anticipation.
Quote of the Day
Shrouds have no pockets. (There's no luggage rack on a hearse.)~. . . as they say
Request email delivery
- Jun 24:
Something Else Democrats Stand For
- Jun 21:
What Do Democrats Stand For?
- Jun 20:
- Jun 19:
A Letter From Thor
- Jun 18:
How The FBI +Used+ To Spend Its Time
- Jun 17:
“Outrageous Congressional Perks”
- Jun 13:
What’s Wrong With That Zucchini???
- Jun 12:
Food Rescue Dot Org
- Jun 11:
Has Morgan Freeman Gone Too Far?
- Jun 10:
Did He Leave?
- Jun 24: