Deficit Reduction
This is good. We all would have preferred the Bipartisan Deficit Reduction Commission to find ways to reduce the deficit by lowering taxes and spending more. But that is not ordinarily how arithmetic works. Politicians know this, but can’t say it. Hence bipartisan commissions.
It won’t be abrupt and it won’t end up exactly as described in this draft report. The mortgage interest deduction on second homes and for loans above $500,000 might or might not be phased out (see, for example, here) and the Social Security retirement age might or might not rise to 69 by 2075 (here). (Gosh, would 65 years allow people enough time to prepare for the change?)
Indeed, ‘radical centrist’ Matt Miller argues that the floated proposals – as unpopular as they will be – are not nearly enough. A 15-cent-a-gallon hike in the gas tax? He scoffs. And rightly so – it should be more like a 15-cent annual hike, which one could ‘beat’ at first by hypermiling and, eventually, by trading up to a more fuel-efficient car.
But that the process and discussion have finally begun is good news.
I’m taking the rest of the day off.
Quote of the Day
This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.
~Western Union internal memo, 1876Search
Request email delivery
Recent Posts
- Feb 25:
Texas and Mars - Feb 24:
Caste Feedback - Feb 23:
What Time Is It On Mars? - Feb 22:
National Margarita Day! - Feb 19:
Is This Anything? - Feb 17:
Octopi, Part II - Feb 17:
Octopi On Ecstasy, Arachnids On Acid - Feb 15:
Two Really Important Things - Feb 14:
Trump Wins 43-57; Selling and Buying PRKR; Schools - Feb 12:
Read This Book
- Feb 25: