Two Hopeful Snippets January 14, 2025 #1 This Pearl Harbor story by Heather Cox Richardson (6 minutes, if you listen at 1.25X). It concludes: Now, once again, democracy is under attack . . . Donald Trump and his cronies have vowed to replace the nonpartisan civil service with loyalists and to weaponize the Department of Justice and the military against those they perceive as enemies. They have promised to incarcerate and deport millions of immigrants, send federal troops into democratic cities, silence LGBTQ plus Americans, prosecute journalists and their political opponents, and end abortion across the country. They want to put in place an autocracy in which a powerful leader and his chosen loyalists make the rules under which the rest of us must live. Will we permit the destruction of American democracy on our watch? When America came under attack before, people like Doris Miller refused to let that happen. For all that American democracy still discriminated against him, it gave him room to stand up for the concept of human equality, and he laid down his life for it. Promoted to cook after the Navy sent him on a publicity tour, Miller was assigned to a new ship, the USS Liscombe, which was struck by a Japanese torpedo on November 24, 1943. It sank within minutes, taking two-thirds of the crew, including Miller, with it. I hear a lot these days about how American democracy is doomed and the reactionaries will win. Maybe. But the beauty of our system is that it gives us people like Doris Miller. Even better, it makes us people like Doris Miller. #2 Republicans won big in the 2024 election, but the streak might not last long: . . . [A] deep dive inside the numbers suggests that while the election results were bad for Democrats, they aren’t quite as awful as they seem. For starters, it’s important to remember that Democrats were fighting an uphill battle this year. Around the globe, in 2024, every single incumbent party in a developed democracy lost vote share. You know the last time that happened? Never. Moreover, while President-elect Donald Trump emerged victorious, his margin of victory, 1.6 points, was the fifth-smallest in the last 100 years. As much as the MAGA world wants to portray his victory as a landslide, it wasn’t. . . . . . . [I]f the last few election cycles tell us anything, political power in America is fleeting. After all, in 2008, Democrats won a governing trifecta … and by 2016, the GOP controlled Congress and the White House. Four years later, the tables were completely turned, and Democrats won back a trifecta … only to lose it to Republicans four years later. Quite simply, it might not be long before the election postmortems are being written about the GOP. BONUS A government of billionaires, by billionaires, for billionaires — 2 minutes. BONUS QUOTE “When Jesus talks about poverty and lifting up the poor, we call it Christianity. When a politician does it, we call it socialism.” — Rev. William Barber
Which Is Worse: Evil Or Stupid? January 14, 2025 Thanks to Glenn Sonnenberg’s Musings Beyond the Bunker for this timely quote from philosopher Bertrand Russell: Bertrand Russell on fascists: “First they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent.” And then, on a related note, there’s this 90-second answer to the question posed by Dietrich Bonhoeffer before he was hanged by the Nazis: Which is worse: evil or stupid? This is by no means to say that most Trump supporters are fools, stupid or evil. In this 15-minute interview to promote his new HBO special, Bill Maher says he’s just not willing to hate half the country. There are less-than-admirable-people on both sides. (Notably, one of the least admirable people, has taken over the Republican Party and the presidency.) Yet as insufferable and off-putting as the elites can be, it probably is a good idea to have really smart, experienced, honest people running our government, as you would want really smart, experienced, honest people managing your money or drafting your will or performing your kidney transplant. Is running the world, or even just the $800 billion Defense Department, not as complex, important, or demanding? And yet people who once called Trump all sorts of terrible things — and probably still think those things privately — capitulate. Which brings us to this timely piece by neoconservative columnist Bill Kristol: How To Capitulate “How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked. “Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.” – Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises (1926) How do you capitulate to power? Gradually and then suddenly. If you’re an unimaginably wealthy and powerful billionaire, you start by spiking an editorial in a newspaper you own. You then visit the president-elect and publicly bend the knee. You donate a relatively modest amount—$1 million—to that president-elect’s inaugural fund. You then spend $40 million for a “documentary” on the wife of the president-elect. Submission occurs gradually and then suddenly. If you’re an undistinguished but ambitious young federal judge, you start by slowing down an open-and-shut case against the presidential candidate who appointed you. You then decide that the long-established practice of appointing special counsels is unconstitutional. You then reach into the internal workings of the Justice Department to try to prevent the attorney general from releasing a report by that special counsel. Currying favor occurs gradually and then consistently. If you’re one of our two major political parties, you first go along with the presidential nominee of your party, however distasteful he is. You then support him as president while still expressing some reservations. But the reservations recede, and you stick with him through his attempt to get a foreign country to help with his re-election. You then downplay his efforts to overturn the election and stop the peaceful transfer of power: ”What is the downside for humoring him for this little bit of time?” You object briefly to his actions on January 6th, but vote overwhelmingly a week later in the House against impeachment, and a month later in the Senate against conviction. You nominate him for president a third time and support him unreservedly. Now you eagerly seek to confirm his nominees, however unqualified, and say not a word against any of his agenda, however irresponsible. Appeasement occurs gradually and then thoroughly. There was one person who understood this all along. As he explained twenty years ago: “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything . . . Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.” This has been our president-elect’s guiding principle. Our country hasn’t yet proved him wrong. Now that he’s set to go back to the Oval Office and once again actually be president, the appeasement, the submission, the capitulation will probably get worse. And it will probably work, at least for a while. The billionaire will get richer. The judge may get promoted. The party will enjoy all the perquisites for power. They and many others will be far better off for having bent the knee than if they had taken a different course. [As, say, Liz Cheney did.] Still, there is a different course. When I quoted Hemingway above, I thought of John McCain. He loved Hemingway, and often quoted his favorite Hemingway character, Robert Jordan, from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.” Is it too much to hope that we might turn the corner at some point soon, and see, in the spirit of John McCain, more fighting and less capitulating? BONUS The 2017 Trump Tax Law Was Skewed to the Rich, Expensive, and Failed to Deliver on Its Promises . . . . . . so the Koch brothers’ “grassroots” PAC is now spending $20 million to build support for renewing it.
Caution! (And A Remarkable Glass Of Wine) January 13, 2025January 12, 2025 CAUTION: Wall Street Watchdog Warns “Clock Is Ticking on a Coming Catastrophic Financial Crash” Not to say this will definitely happen, of course; but it could be wise to keep some money on the sidelines. CAUTION: White Christian nationalists are poised to remake America in their image. Paul B: “Have you watched the Bad Faith documentary? Rated 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.” QUOTE OF THE WEEK “House Democrats are focused on lowering the high cost of living in America. Not invading Greenland.” — Hakeem Jeffries BONUS How a gymnast drinks wine.
Who Do YOU Think Was The Worst In 100 Years? January 12, 2025January 12, 2025 Chris F.: Biden is the worst president in 100 years, and people in your party belong in prison for hiding his cognitive failures. I’ve read you for 20+ years. I’m done now. The democrats have ruined this country by spending it into oblivion and dividing us with this woke DEI insanity. I consider myself a moderate, like many people I know. We don’t love Trump, but we hate what a group of lowlife grifters and bullshit artists the Democrat party currently is. The middle voted not for Trump, but against you and your decades of failed policies. There’s a reason so many people like me, that have voted D in the past, voted for Trump and will probably never vote D ever again. The problem isn’t us. It’s you. Me: Thanks, Chris. I consider myself pretty moderate, too. That’s why I’ve been such a persistent fan of instant run-off voting and of Bill Maher’s rants against the over-woke. But “ruined this country” by “spending into oblivion?” From 1946 to 1980, the National Debt steadily shrank as a proportion of GDP, from 122% all the way back to 30% where it had been before the Depression and WWII. It only began growing again when Reagan cut taxes on the rich. By the time Reagan/Bush handed it off to Clinton, the Debt as a proportion of GDP had doubled from 30% to 61%. The only two presidents in recent memory to have left the Debt shrinking relative to the economy when they left office were Democrats: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton reduced the Debt/GDP ratio to 55%. Bush 43 then ramped it up to 82% — and handed Obama a financial crisis that required deficit spending to avert a depression, taking the ratio up to 99% by 2012 . . . but then edging up only to 104% by the time he handed it to Trump — who ran it up to 129%. These numbers are not meant to be precise (the federal fiscal year begins three months before each calendar year, and there’s a reasonable discussion to be had about when it’s fair to begin and end “crediting” a president’s actions with impacting the Debt), but you get the gist. And it looks as though Biden will be the third president in recent memory to leave the Debt ratio lower than he found it, back at around 122%. It’s also important to draw a distinction between what the borrowing has been for. In the run up from 30% in 1929 to 122% in 1946, it was to cope with the Depression and win World War II. Under Reagan-Bush-Bush-Trump, it has been largely for lowering taxes on the rich. Under Democratic presidents, it has been largely for investments in infrastructure and human capital. I didn’t get very far in Accounting, but I do know the difference between spending (as, when, say, you gas up your yacht) and investing (as when, say, you install solar panels). Unlike business accounting, federal accounting makes no such distinction. Winning World War II or funding 70,000 infrastructure projects strike me as worthy investments. Tax cuts for the rich — not so much. If Trump follows through on his stated plans, he’ll again spike up the Debt. (And inflation.) So was Biden “the worst president in the last 100 years” as you say? He’s handing off an economy the Economist calls “the envy of the world” — 4% unemployment, record-high stock prices, wages rising faster than inflation that itself is barely above the Fed target. To me, the infrastructure bill and CHIPs Act that Biden pushed through, whatever his cognitive difficulties, are huge wins for the country. He also secured a strong bipartisan fix to the border crisis that Trump scuttled out of nothing more than self-interest. If the border poses a national emergency as he says, then his delaying the fix by a year comes pretty close to treason. Or is, at the very least, not something to blame Biden for. There’s so much more I’m sure both of us could say (a much strengthened NATO and weakened Russia?) — I will look forward to any further thoughts you want to share — but I can’t leave out asking how you can rate Bush 43 ahead of Biden. A nice guy, to be sure . . . but prior to Trump, wasn’t he the worst president in 100 years? He gave us totally preventable disasters at home and abroad. BONUS Trump’s ‘border czar’ floats ‘fresh idea’ — a hotline to report undocumented immigrants Experts have warned mass deportations could have a massive impact on the economy. In 2022, undocumented immigrant households paid $46.8 billion in federal taxes and $29.3 billion in state and local taxes, according to an October report by the American Immigration Council. They also contributed $22.6 billion to Social Security and $5.7 billion to Medicare. Additionally, undocumented immigrants make up about a quarter of U.S. farm workers, one-fifth of maintenance workers, and 17 percent of construction workers, according to Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
Riveting TV January 10, 2025 Watching Los Angeles burn yesterday was riveting and heartbreaking. Watching President Carter’s funeral was riveting, moving, and inspirational. There was so much more to his life and presidency than most know. (Stuart Eizenstat made a strong case that, while “Jimmy Carter may not deserve to be on Mount Rushmore,” he was definitely “in the foothills.”) Watching Trump’s sentencing, scheduled for 9:30 this morning — which even his own Supreme Court narrowly allowed to go forward — is likely to be riveting as well. > What a contrast the twice-impeached incoming president is to the one to we yesterday bade farewell. > And what a contrast to President Jed Bartlet, just the best damn president ever. “The West Wing” premiered 25 years ago. I re-watched the pilot Sunday ($1.99 on Amazon Prime). President Bartlet doesn’t much appear until the end — but what an ending. Treat yourself. Which got me thinking of other riveting Aaron-Sorkin-written speeches . . . like this one from The Newsroom that many of you will remember, where Jeff Daniels, playing a national news anchor, is asked why America is the greatest country in the world. His answer is a decade old but resonates just as well today. Which got some algorithm (or was it coincidence?) to suggest that I listen to Jeff Daniels’ life story, which has proven to be a wonderful surprise — not least the songs he wrote and performs. It’s an audiobook, not TV, but it’s great. In the 44 years since Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter and began tipping things in favor of the rich . . . which got worse under Bush 43 and worse still under Trump . . . the average American has had a tougher and tougher go of it, even as they watched centi-millionaires become billionaires, billionaires become multi-billionaires, and at least a couple of multi-billionaires become fractional trillionaires. With no sign of let-up. It’s that gross inequality that led to a demagogue’s rise. As Nick Hanauer presciently warned a decade ago, The Pitchforks Are Coming. And now, wearing MAGA hats and storming the Capitol, they’re here. Because the party of FDR, Kennedy, Carter, Clinton, Obama, and Biden is the party that gives us things like Social Security and Medicare, $35 insulin and paid family leave, anti-trust enforcement and airline deregulation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the minimum wage, 70,000 infrastructure projects and — yes — occasional tax hikes on the richest among us . . . . . . our job is to use the next two years to win back the House and Senate, so we can limit the demagogue’s damage (while applauding any good things he gets done) . . . and then, four years from now, return the presidency to the hands of a Republican like Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Dick Nixon (minus the demons), Gerald Ford, or George H.W. Bush . . . or, better still . . . to a Democrat like any of those named above. And we’ve got lots of them.
Yes, Wow, And Double Wow January 8, 2025 Rob F.: “Do you get the feeling the U.S. is looking more and more like Russia, with a strongman autocrat and a small band of obsequious oligarchs?” Kathy M.: “The Atlantic has just published How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 Days, by Timothy W. Ryback. It’s well worth your time. Your refrain that we must stay politically engaged is demonstrated in every paragraph.” → Thanks, Kathy. It was indeed worth my time. But of even more direct, immediate relevance was Monday’s Maddow. I hope it hasn’t expired and that you can watch simply by clicking that link. It just builds and builds, mostly with stuff I didn’t know. And while I have the floor, I’d like to say that once-a-week Maddow is even better than five-day-a-week Maddow was. Having a full week — instead of a day — to hone each one has just made them better.
Two Neo-Fascist Megalomaniacs Walk Into A Bar Not Singing Puff The Magic Dragon January 8, 2025 You think I was hard on Elon Musk yesterday? That was just the half of it. Robert Reich asks: Why is the richest person on earth with the largest political platform in the world and the next U.S. president in his pocket becoming a global neo-fascist? Musk, he writes, is: boosting the far-right party in Germany with neo-Nazi ties . . . attacking the Italian judiciary . . . urging support for Britain’s far-right anti-immigration Reform U.K. Party . . . demanding Britain “free Tommy Robinson,” the far-right founder of the English Defence League . . . in jail because he was found to have defamed a teenage Syrian refugee and then defied a British court order by repeating the false claims. (Robinson has been previously jailed for assault, mortgage fraud, and traveling on a false passport to the United States, where he has sought to establish ties with right-wing groups.) allowing on X inflammatory lies of a kind that incited anti-immigrant riots in Britain . . . calling Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau an “insufferable tool” . . . . . . It will not be the first time in history that someone is seduced by the thrill of unconstrained power, although it may be the first time that so much of it is concentrated in one unelected megalomaniac. Worth reading in full. You’ve got an elected incoming president who kept a book of Hitler’s speeches by his bedside paired with a visionary but neo-fascist unelected co-president. Politicians and CEOs here in the U.S. and around the world are afraid of them. There is so much wrong with this picture. But while applauding whatever good things they may do (and we should, as I suggested yesterday), our job is to step up, yet again, to win the next couple of free and fair elections while we still have them. Tired and discouraged though we understandably are — I mean really: who isn’t sick of this? — it’s worth remembering: First, that the pendulum tends to swing back and forth. Second, that sometimes we win these things — like the 20 years out of the last 32 that we controlled the White House; the 16 of 32 when we controlled the Senate; the 14 of 32 when we controlled the House. And got things done like Clinton’s assault weapons ban and balanced budget; like Obamacare and the Infrastructure bill and the CHIPs Act and enormous jobs growth (46 million under Clinton/Obama/Biden; 2 under Bush/Bush/Trump) and my right to marry the person I love. (It’s also worth remembering that it’s hard to control the Senate, even though we did half the time, because Idaho and Wyoming get as many senators as California and New York. And hard to control the House because our Republican friends have more effectively gerrymandered than we.) So! As we’re asked in the weeks ahead to get back in the game . . . by running for office, by encouraging young people to run, by joining an Indivisible chapter, by volunteering with Field Team 6, by chipping in to fund these and so many other worthy blue efforts (very much including your state party and the DNC) . . . the most constructive, soul-nourishing answer we can give will be: YES. REST IN PEACE Peter Yarrow died yesterday. I spent most Saturday nights senior alone in the dark (my roommates were out chasing co-eds), gazing off at nothing, listening to Album 1700. It’s almost all hauntingly beautiful (only “I Dig Rock and Roll Music” and the “Big Blue Frog” break the mood) — but the two songs that touched me directly were “The Great Mandala,” about a young man who refused to go to Vietnam — I could never have gone either, nor likely summoned the courage not to go as he did; 1968 was a very fraught time for me (blessedly, I drew a very high lottery number) — and “Whatshername.” That one tells the story of a guy dropping in on an old college chum — seemingly for no special reason. He’s happily married with two kids “and one on the way,” but . . . well, listen and you’ll see why he’s really come. But before he gets there, he makes a little small talk — “How’s the preacher? How’s Don? Did he go back to school? No kidding! I thought he was gay.” — and then he gets to the point of his visit. But wait. Did hear that right? “No kidding! I thought he was gay.” It was just so . . . casual. Deeply closeted, listened over and over for notes of contempt or disgust — but nothing. I had spent the prior 10 years wound so tight — and this didn’t matter to the two bros? Gay, not gay, who cares? Really? It would be two more years before I could finally break out of my shell — I thought I was the only one like me in a college of 5,000 men, hundreds of whom, I would later learn, shared my same secret (did I mention it was 1968?) — but it sure stuck with me. So in a way I became friends with Peter Yarrow 57 years ago. But then became actual friends in 2015. I posted a long message he wrote us all in 2018, when he was 80. And concluded: “Now that, I would say, is a life well lived. And he ain’t done.” Yesterday, at 86, he was. I loved reading his obituary. A gentler, more loving soul I’ve never met.
America: Where Kings Were Once Toppled January 7, 2025 Commentary by former Republican strategist Steve Schmidt: . . . Donald Trump is the king of the hill. He has taken the proverbial castle, and it is the castle that he must now defend from the horde he incited and will soon disappoint. . . . He will claim that he has fixed everything that is broken in America before very long. He will spin magical yarns about making America great again, and everywhere he goes he will brag about fixing every problem except one. Yours. When it comes to your problems, Trump will say that he doesn’t have the power to do that. . . . Elon Musk has embraced his white South African pedigree with a zeal that would have made even the most vicious Afrikaner beating in a black skull with a club smile in delight. Whether cheerleading for the British racist Tommy Robinson or the German AFD, which holds that the SS was not a criminal organization, Elon Musk is dropping the curtain. Following the connective thread is not difficult— or rather should not be — but for much of America’s media it is a bridge too far. For them, it is better to pretend that it isn’t happening. The news these days is often what can be seen and heard, but is not allowed to be spoken. That’s too bad because the danger is coming closer. Donald Trump and Elon Musk are kings in America. Their courts are happy, fat, rich and powerful. Millions of people whom they disdain and despise cheer for them, and will countenance no criticisms of them. It is good to be the king as they say, but America has always been a bad place to try and build a kingdom. There is a simple reason for that, and it has do with the national character. I remember reading somewhere once upon a time about a land of fierce people who topple kings because “all men are created equal,” and some people have an allergy to tyranny in all its many forms. Listen: there’s a ton to admire and thank Musk for. Anyone who can mastermind a giant rocket that returns snugly to its launch pad for reuse is little short of a miracle worker. If he can find ways to make our government operate more efficiently without at the same time doing terrible harm, that will be great. Remember how badly the Obamacare roll-out went? In came a few Silicon Valley geniuses who got it working in a month. Maybe the same sort of thing can be done to improve other systems. We should all cheer if (for example) Department of Defense bloat can be reduced and our tax-dollars more effectively focused. And there may well be some good things Trump accomplishes, although you can be sure that much of what he takes credit for will in fact have been largely or entirely the work of Biden & Co. Things like the 70,000 infrastructure projects Biden launched that most Republicans voted against . . . and the strong measures to fix the border Trump himself scuttled . . . and — one fervently hopes — the kind of sweeping Mid-East peace deal Antony Blinken has been working so hard to achieve, as described here Sunday. If and when Trump and Musk do good things, we should applaud for two reasons. First, “credit where credit is due.” Second, it will make our criticism more credible when they do awful, appalling things, as their Project 2025 so clearly threatens to do. Those things begin a week from Monday. When good things may begin remains to be seen. (I plan to write soon about one that I can imagine happening — sensible Social Security Reform.)
More Milk And Frank Zappa January 5, 2025 Per yesterday’s post on switching from cow’s milk to soy or oat milk (but not almond): Rich Guess: “Have you ever read James Cromwell’s piece on why he glued his hand to a Starbucks counter?” → I have now! Thanks, Rich! (Cromwell played Logan Roy’s brother on “Succession.”) Executive summary: Starbucks knows soy and oat milk are far better for the environment — yet grossly overcharges for them. To which I would add: they’re missing a great opportunity to educate 50 million customers a week on the virtues of those alternatives. We’re all on this planet together, after all. David Hood: “So, when water is used in agriculture, where does it go? Is it gone forever?” → Clearly not. So (I asked ChatGPT), “does it matter that it takes 20 times more water to make whole milk than soy?” While the water does cycle back into the ecosystem, the context and the way it’s used still matter a lot. Here’s why: Resource Allocation: A significant amount of water used in dairy production is sourced from regions experiencing water scarcity or drought. For instance, parts of California heavily rely on irrigation for dairy and almond production, affecting the availability of water for other critical uses and ecosystems. Water Quality: The water that cycles back often carries pollutants from the agricultural processes, including fertilizers, pesticides, and animal waste. This can contaminate water supplies and aquatic ecosystems, impacting both wildlife and human populations. Energy Consumption: Treating and pumping large volumes of water requires considerable energy. Reducing water usage in agriculture directly reduces greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy consumption. Local Impact: When a lot of water is drawn for agricultural use in a specific region, it can significantly affect local water tables and the availability of water for residential use, affecting both communities and wildlife. It also matters that whole milk has more than triple the CO2 impact. UNRELATED BONUS 45 possibly prescient seconds with Frank Zappa Recorded 38 years ago, in 1986.
Sorry Almond Milk, It’s Soy By A Mile January 5, 2025 But first . . . On the Brink of Anarchy? By Lucas Kunce: In the late 1800’s wealth inequality was skyrocketing, workers were organizing for power against an elite profit-maximizing class, and political polarization was at a zenith. As a result, people caught political fever, and it became contentious. Check out how familiar this description of the late 1800’s sounds . . . We’ve been here before. Worth reading in full. And now . . . I asked ChatGPT to rank milk based on environmental impact. Instants later: Sure. From least to most impactful: Soy Milk: Uses the least water (28 liters per liter of milk) and land (0.7 square meters per liter) and produces relatively low greenhouse gas emissions (0.75 kg CO2e per liter). It also has low eutrophication potential. Oat Milk: Requires slightly more water (48 liters per liter) and land (0.8 square meters per liter) than soy milk but still has a fairly low environmental footprint. Emissions are around 0.42 kg CO2e per liter. Almond Milk: Uses a significant amount of water (371 liters per liter), but requires less land (0.5 square meters per liter) and has low greenhouse gas emissions (0.42 kg CO2e per liter). Skim Milk: Has a high water use (518 liters per liter) and land use (7.1 square meters per liter), and emissions (around 2.00 kg per liter). Dairy Milk: Has the highest environmental impact across all metrics: it uses the most water (628 liters per liter), land (8.9 square meters per liter), and produces the most greenhouse gas emissions (2.5 kg CO2e per liter) That’s quite a difference! Regular milk requires 22 times more water per liter than soy, 12 times more land, and emits triple the CO2 equivalent. Better still, it may also be healthiest: From most to least: Soy Milk: Packed with protein (7-8g per cup) and essential amino acids, soy milk is great for muscle health. It’s also rich in omega-3 fatty acids which are good for brain health and can reduce the risk of heart disease. Almond Milk: Low in calories and carbs, almond milk is a heart-healthy option due to its healthy fats and high vitamin E content. Avoid the sweetened variants for the best benefits. Oat Milk: This digestible option is rich in fiber (1-2g per cup) and low in fat. It’s especially good for reducing cholesterol and boosting immunity with its vitamin D and calcium content. Skim Milk: Despite having less fat, it retains vitamins A and D, calcium, vitamin B2, B12, and phosphorus. Good for muscle and bone health but lacks healthy fats found in plant-based alternatives. Whole Milk: High in saturated fats which can impact cholesterol levels, but also contains important nutrients like calcium, vitamin D and protein. If you’re an infant or still growing, it may be a different story. Otherwise: soy or oat at Starbucks, in smoothies, and on your cornflakes.