How I cracked half my molar eating a slice of tomato will go down in The Annals of Dental Mystery as its own separate chapter. But when I settled into his chair, my dentist announced that I needed a new crown, which I always modestly accept, being the King of Patience. Because we dental patients know the drill: First visit is for preparing the tooth and making that delicious and oddly cold playdough impression to send to the lab, and for installing the awful ill-shapen and bad-tasting aluminum ‘temporary.’ The following week is for getting that awful biting-the-inside-of-your-cheek deal going. Second visit is for finding out that the lab didn’t make the crown quite right. Third visit is for – ta-da! – successfully fitting the crown and handing over $1,000, give or take, for your regality.
Without even bragging, my dentist (who – a little journalistic probing revealed once I was allowed to talk – is just one of 40 out of 7,000 in Florida to have this technology) wheeled over a cart with a control panel and computer screen, displaying the 3D image of my tooth and designing the crown right in front of me, like Leonardo Da Dentist. Then, when it was perfect – get this – he clicked GO and sent the instructions to a milling machine in the backroom, which set about sculpting a small porcelain block into the precise crown that had been specified.
Anyone under 30 will know this as ‘CAD/CAM’ – computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacture. But instead of milling the prototype for a new carburetor, they were milling my tooth #14 (which I call Herbie).
(As you probably know, your teeth are numbered. You start with the top right wisdom tooth way in the back, which is #1, and go all the way around to #16; then drop down to #17, the wisdom tooth right under #16, and back around to the right. Those of us whose wisdom teeth now hang on leather bands around our necks [to intimidate potential adversaries] count from #2 to #31, skipping #16 and #17. William ‘the Refrigerator’ Perry, who needs nothing around his neck to intimidate, and is available to appear at your next event, seems to be missing #6 thru #11 and #22 thru #27.)
Within a second or two of my dentist’s clicking GO, the computer reported that milling would take 17 minutes – the way your browser estimates the length of a download – which gave me time to return some phone calls (‘I’m at the dentist, but I have 13 minutes and 12 seconds left to talk’) and my dentist time to go out for a beer, or whatever dentists do in these circumstances. (Call their brokers, more likely.)
In he came 17 minutes later, bing, bang, boom . . . and then . . . after the ritual ‘bite down, chop-chop’ so many of us are familiar with (‘No, it’s still too high,’ you say, ten or twelve consecutive times, feeling increasingly embarrassed and guilty for being so difficult, when, really, what have you done wrong? But what if he keeps drilling deeper and deeper to make the fit and goes all the way through the crown to your nerve or – worse – breaks the crown and you have to start all over again? Could it be you are just being difficult? Or are setting your bite funny because of the Novocain?) . . . it was perfection.
A crown in a single visit.
To find a dentist near you who’s made the $100,000 investment and taken the training to master this system, click here. (The link’s in the box at lower right.) Despair not if you don’t find one; the listing is incomplete. Your own dentist may be off at CAD/CAM school as we speak. Thank you, Dr. Nassery.
WITH THIS CUBIC ZIRCONIUM, I THEE WED
‘Similar to opposite-sex couples, same-sex couples are entitled to the same fundamental right to follow their hearts and publicly commit to a lifetime partnership with the person of their choosing. The recognition that this fundamental right applies equally to same-sex couples cannot legitimately be said to harm anyone.’
– New York State Supreme Court Justice Ling-Cohan, from a 62-page ruling Friday
New York Supreme Court, as you may know, sits beneath New York’s Appellate Court (what part of ‘supreme,’ one wonders, did the Empire State founders not understand?), so this thing is just getting started.
All of these decisions will ultimately come down to a decision, someday, of the U.S. Supreme Court (unless the Constitution can be amended to exclude gays and lesbians from the equal protection provision).
Still, it may be that attitudes are slowly changing. No great harm seems to have befallen the citizenry since Vermont started issuing civil unions or Massachusetts began issuing marriage licenses. The Canadian dollar has actually strengthened against our own since Canada started down the gay-marriage path. So far as I know, the Dutch are doing fine also.
It is in society’s interest to encourage loving, committed relationships, and to provide its citizens equal protection under the law.
No one should take lightly the concerns of millions of people who, for religious reasons, cannot abide gay marriage. But this has nothing to do with religion.
Religions have every right to condemn gay marriage; or, for that matter, to ban women (or men) from their priesthoods, to demand celibacy until marriage, even to advocate – though not to practice, unless it becomes legal – the stoning-to-death of non-virgin brides, as prescribed in the Bible.
But church and state should be separate. Rights are not rites.
Surely, if those who oppose gay unions on religious grounds prove correct, they will go to heaven. Shouldn’t that be consolation enough?
Quote of the Day
A penny saved may be a penny earned, but it's one boring penny. A penny invested, on the other hand, bounces around. It gets bigger one day, smaller the next. A bit player in the drama of global finance, that penny buys a guy a balcony seat in the theater of macroeconomics.~Susan Stewart
Request email delivery
- Jan 22:
The Other Pillow Guy*
- Jan 21:
How Great Was That?
- Jan 20:
You Respond To Umair Haque
- Jan 19:
The Three Big Lies
- Jan 18:
Two Harvard Grads Still For Trump
- Jan 15:
Of Insurrection, Inequality, And Your Stocks
- Jan 14:
Meanwhile . . .
- Jan 13:
Ronald Reagan Speaks
- Jan 12:
What Do Adelson and Netanyahu Think?
- Jan 10:
Post Trump, Post Truth
- Jan 22: