Two Important Arguments For Your Weekend Consideration January 5, 2024January 4, 2024 The Case for Disqualifying Trump Is Strong, writes David French of the Fourteenth Amendment. . . . [N]one of the legal analysis I’ve offered above relies on any sort of progressive or liberal constitutional analysis. It’s all text and history, the essence of originalism. In fact, the most influential law review article arguing that Trump is disqualified is by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, two of the most respected conservative legal minds in the United States. So no, it would not be a stretch for a conservative Supreme Court to apply Section 3 to Trump. Bill Ackman’s by-now-famous essay on over-wokeism at Harvard — and at much of the rest of academia. I first became concerned about Harvard when 34 Harvard student organizations, early on the morning of October 8th before Israel had taken any military actions in Gaza, came out publicly in support of Hamas, a globally recognized terrorist organization, holding Israel ‘solely responsible’ for Hamas’ barbaric and heinous acts. How could this be? I wondered. His conclusions are well worth pondering, whether or not you fully agree.