Skip to content
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

  • Home
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Bio
  • Archives
  • Links
  • Me-Mail
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

Section 3

August 16, 2023August 15, 2023

Five facts about the indictments.

  1. Biden didn’t indict Trump, four different grand juries did.  “The reason we HAVE grand juries is to make sure no one gets indicted out of a personal vendetta.”
  2. This isn’t about “free speech,” it’s about what he did.
  3. It doesn’t matter whether Trump believed the election was stolen.
  4. Trump has been given deference most other criminal defendants never would.
  5. It’s not political: Trump was in legal trouble long before politics.

See if you agree.



Separate from his potential criminal liability, to be decided by juries, there’s Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.  Is he Constitutionally disqualified serving a second term, regardless?


Two conservative law professors active in the Federalist Society argue that the original meaning of the 14th Amendment makes Donald Trump ineligible to hold government office.


The Federalist Society is no friend of the Democrats, as you know.  Yet these guys deeply researched the question and reached  four firm conclusions:


First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation.

Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications.

Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment.

Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.”

It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election.


Here are the twists and turns of what needs to happen to get this decided by the Supreme Court — pronto. 

There’s no time to lose.



BONUS

The 10 Best Investing Books of All Time — allegedly.

 

Post navigation

← Chips / Solar / AMC / Witch Hunt!
The Wheels Of Justice Turn Slowly . . . →

Quote of the Day

"What's so fair about eliminating the interest deduction on your first car but not on your second home?"

Murray Weidenbaum

Subscribe

 Advice

The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need

"So full of tips and angles that only a booby or a billionaire could not benefit." -- The New York Times

Help

MYM Emergency?

Too Much Junk?

Tax Questions?

Ask Less

Recent Posts

  • Doug, Simon, Dave, John, Caitlan, And Pete -- I'm A Fan

    May 8, 2025
  • Fair Harvard

    May 7, 2025
  • Your Future Imaginary Friend

    May 5, 2025
  • Conservative Peggy And Liberal Thom

    May 4, 2025
  • Little Marco Predicts

    May 3, 2025
  • May Day! May Day!

    May 3, 2025
  • Rising Prices, Falling Poll Numbers, See You Tomorrow

    April 29, 2025
  • He's Having A Lot Of Fun

    April 29, 2025
  • A Word from the Wise

    April 26, 2025
  • The Huge, Crucial Difference Between Neville Chamberlain And Donald Trump

    April 24, 2025
Andrew Tobias Books
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
©2025 Andrew Tobias - All Rights Reserved | Website: Whirled Pixels | Author Photo: Tony Adams