Mother Nature Doesn’t Do Bailouts April 28, 2009March 13, 2017 PERSPECTIVE FROM ‘DR. REALIST’ Here is Dr. Nouriel Roubini in Newsweek. He thinks the economic bottom is a year off and that the recent bounce in stocks is a bear market rally – but that the chance of a depression is now small. ANOTHER LEADING REPUBLICAN ON THE ENVIRONMENT Yesterday I noted Richard Nixon’s veto of the EPA (overridden by Congress) and the Reagan/Bush lack of interest in such things . . . shared, it seems, by Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner. Here now Texas Representative Joe Barton, the ranking Republican member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, in an exchange with Energy Secretary (and Nobel-prize-winning physicist) Stephen Chu. In the notes below that video, you’ll find this earlier Barton world view: I believe that Earth’s climate is changing, but I think it’s changing for natural variation reasons. And I think mankind has been adopting, or adapting, to climate as long as man has walked the Earth. When it rains we find shelter. When it’s hot, we get shade. When it’s cold, we find a warm place to stay. Adaptation is the practical, affordable, utterly natural reflex response to nature when the planet is heating or cooling, as it always is. ☞ So, with time, we’ll just rebuild New York City in the Catskills, move Los Angeles into Beverly Hills, move South Florida to North Carolina, Boston to Worcester, and Houston to Lubbock. MOTHER NATURE DOESN’T DO BAILOUTS Shame on me for failing to excerpt this from Tom Friedman when it first appeared a few weeks ago in the New York Times: . . . What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall – when Mother Nature and the market both said: ‘No more.’ We have created a system for growth that depended on our building more and more stores to sell more and more stuff made in more and more factories in China, powered by more and more coal that would cause more and more climate change but earn China more and more dollars to buy more and more U.S. T-bills so America would have more and more money to build more and more stores and sell more and more stuff that would employ more and more Chinese … We can’t do this anymore. ‘We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,’ said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks – water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land – and not by generating renewable flows. ‘You can get this burst of wealth that we have created from this rapacious behavior,’ added Romm. ‘But it has to collapse, unless adults stand up and say, ‘This is a Ponzi scheme. We have not generated real wealth, and we are destroying a livable climate …’ Real wealth is something you can pass on in a way that others can enjoy.’ Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year – more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world’s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit. ‘Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,’ argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: ‘Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.’ One of those who has been warning me of this for a long time is Paul Gilding, the Australian environmental business expert. He has a name for this moment – when both Mother Nature and Father Greed have hit the wall at once – ‘The Great Disruption.’ ‘We are taking a system operating past its capacity and driving it faster and harder,’ he wrote me. ‘No matter how wonderful the system is, the laws of physics and biology still apply.’ We must have growth, but we must grow in a different way. For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let’s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks. Gilding says he’s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea’s new national paradigm for development is called: ‘Low carbon, green growth.’ Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes – and we’re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways. In the meantime, says Gilding, take notes: ‘When we look back, 2008 will be a momentous year in human history. Our children and grandchildren will ask us, ‘What was it like? What were you doing when it started to fall apart? What did you think? What did you do?‘ Often in the middle of something momentous, we can’t see its significance. But for me there is no doubt: 2008 will be the marker – the year when ‘The Great Disruption’ began.’