Skip to content
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

  • Home
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Bio
  • Archives
  • Links
  • Me-Mail
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

Money Market Funds

July 10, 2001February 20, 2017

David Jelinek: I’m looking at opening a tax-free money market account. Let’s say the going rate for taxable money market funds is 4.75% and that I’m in the 36% federal bracket. That means that my goal is to find a tax-free MM account yielding at least 4.75% * (1-.36), or at least 3.04%.

Now here are a few issues:

1. When I find the yield for a tax-free MM acct, that yield isn’t going to stay the same. So how do I judge? Should I just make a decision based on the current taxable and tax-free yields and figure they’ll stay about the same relative to one another?

☞ Yes. That’s a reasonable, if imperfect, assumption.

2. Should I even bother getting a tax-free MM acct in the first place? Maybe I’ll beat that 3.04% figure by 40 or 50 basis points if I’m lucky. Do you think that’s really worth it?

☞ No. No one should ordinarily keep huge amounts in a money market fund, and therefore, the difference in absolute dollars is pretty trivial, and not worth your time worrying about. Fifty basis points on $10,000 is $50.

3. It’s aggravating to think that I won’t even keep pace with inflation. I hate the way the tax code works.

☞ It’s much better in Burundi. Well, on balance, maybe not. To beat inflation safely and with a tax advantage, consider Series I savings bonds.

4. I found something very puzzling about the whole performance vs. expense ratio deal: According to imoneynet.com, two of the best performing tax-free MM funds are Strong Municipal MMF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt MMF. As it happens, Strong has beaten Vanguard every year since 1994 (which is the earliest year for which I have data). And yet, Strong’s total expenses total a whopping 1.1% while Vanguard totals .34% !!!

☞ You are reading the numbers wrong – adding the management fee to the expense ratio. Actually, the management fee is part of the expense ratio. Based on the web sites you linked me to, Strong’s municipal money market expense ratio is 0.6% and Vanguard’s is 0.18%.

So Strong is consistently outperforming Vanguard by about 1% every year before expenses!?! Is the muni market THAT inefficient? What the heck is going on here?

☞ I haven’t studied it, but Strong may be taking a little more risk in the nature of the securities it will buy and the length of maturities it will accept.

What do you do for a money market account?

☞ I don’t pay much attention to this. I just use the ones that come linked with my brokerage accounts.

Post navigation

← CN, But First a Word About Bread
The 50-Year Loss Carryforward →

Quote of the Day

"We’re operating the planet like a business in liquidation."

Al Gore

Subscribe

 Advice

The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need

"So full of tips and angles that only a booby or a billionaire could not benefit." -- The New York Times

Help

MYM Emergency?

Too Much Junk?

Tax Questions?

Ask Less

Recent Posts

  • Of Profits, Protests, and Posters

    May 13, 2025
  • The President's Plane . . . Oh, Brother

    May 12, 2025
  • From Driverless Taxis To Busy Baby And Beyond

    May 11, 2025
  • Three Great Men

    May 11, 2025
  • Doug, Simon, Dave, John, Caitlan, And Pete -- I'm A Fan

    May 8, 2025
  • Fair Harvard

    May 7, 2025
  • Your Future Imaginary Friend

    May 5, 2025
  • Conservative Peggy And Liberal Thom

    May 4, 2025
  • Little Marco Predicts

    May 3, 2025
  • May Day! May Day!

    May 3, 2025
Andrew Tobias Books
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
©2025 Andrew Tobias - All Rights Reserved | Website: Whirled Pixels | Author Photo: Tony Adams