Skip to content
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

  • Home
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Bio
  • Archives
  • Links
  • Me-Mail
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

Money Market Funds

July 10, 2001February 20, 2017

David Jelinek: I’m looking at opening a tax-free money market account. Let’s say the going rate for taxable money market funds is 4.75% and that I’m in the 36% federal bracket. That means that my goal is to find a tax-free MM account yielding at least 4.75% * (1-.36), or at least 3.04%.

Now here are a few issues:

1. When I find the yield for a tax-free MM acct, that yield isn’t going to stay the same. So how do I judge? Should I just make a decision based on the current taxable and tax-free yields and figure they’ll stay about the same relative to one another?

☞ Yes. That’s a reasonable, if imperfect, assumption.

2. Should I even bother getting a tax-free MM acct in the first place? Maybe I’ll beat that 3.04% figure by 40 or 50 basis points if I’m lucky. Do you think that’s really worth it?

☞ No. No one should ordinarily keep huge amounts in a money market fund, and therefore, the difference in absolute dollars is pretty trivial, and not worth your time worrying about. Fifty basis points on $10,000 is $50.

3. It’s aggravating to think that I won’t even keep pace with inflation. I hate the way the tax code works.

☞ It’s much better in Burundi. Well, on balance, maybe not. To beat inflation safely and with a tax advantage, consider Series I savings bonds.

4. I found something very puzzling about the whole performance vs. expense ratio deal: According to imoneynet.com, two of the best performing tax-free MM funds are Strong Municipal MMF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt MMF. As it happens, Strong has beaten Vanguard every year since 1994 (which is the earliest year for which I have data). And yet, Strong’s total expenses total a whopping 1.1% while Vanguard totals .34% !!!

☞ You are reading the numbers wrong – adding the management fee to the expense ratio. Actually, the management fee is part of the expense ratio. Based on the web sites you linked me to, Strong’s municipal money market expense ratio is 0.6% and Vanguard’s is 0.18%.

So Strong is consistently outperforming Vanguard by about 1% every year before expenses!?! Is the muni market THAT inefficient? What the heck is going on here?

☞ I haven’t studied it, but Strong may be taking a little more risk in the nature of the securities it will buy and the length of maturities it will accept.

What do you do for a money market account?

☞ I don’t pay much attention to this. I just use the ones that come linked with my brokerage accounts.

Post navigation

← CN, But First a Word About Bread
The 50-Year Loss Carryforward →

Quote of the Day

"The Beardstown Ladies’ Common-Sense Investment Guide. A classic from the investment club that has outperformed Wall Street gurus three to one. ("It’s easy to get investment advice these days. But in this volatile market"

American Bookseller\'s December 1997 list of recommended investment books.

Subscribe

 Advice

The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need

"So full of tips and angles that only a booby or a billionaire could not benefit." -- The New York Times

Help

MYM Emergency?

Too Much Junk?

Tax Questions?

Ask Less

Recent Posts

  • James Comey + Taylor Swift

    August 19, 2025
  • Getting By On $100 Million -- And The Pando Plan

    August 18, 2025
  • Putin Is Winning

    August 17, 2025
  • I Have Your Weekend All Planned Out For You

    August 14, 2025
  • Tough On Crime (Unless She Worked With Jeffrey Epstein Or Stormed The Capitol)

    August 13, 2025
  • Bully . . . Bedlam

    August 12, 2025
  • Bankrupting Yet Another Enterprise; Threatening Your Life

    August 11, 2025
  • Don't Miss Today's Last Item: What A Soft Coup Looks Like

    August 8, 2025
  • The Mozart Of Math

    August 7, 2025
  • A Few Words About Death

    August 6, 2025
Andrew Tobias Books
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
©2025 Andrew Tobias - All Rights Reserved | Website: Whirled Pixels | Author Photo: Tony Adams