Skip to content
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

  • Home
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Bio
  • Archives
  • Links
  • Me-Mail
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

Maybe We Should Give Orphans Marlboros . . . and Send Them to a Tax Haven

June 14, 2001January 26, 2017

TAX HAVENS

Spencer Martin: ‘I have to object to the idea that the OECD is a trustworthy organization – they epitomize the international bureaucracy of unelected mandarins who want to control things just for the glory of control. The OECD initiative is only about tax havens on the surface. Its main impetus is to implement France’s ideas about eliminating ‘harmful tax competition’ among nations and the need to ‘harmonize’ tax rates across members (at the highest common denominator, of course). Something rather like forcing Florida to charge New York tax rates.’

☞ I doubt we are in danger of having France impose its tax laws on us any time soon – but getting that missile shield in place, and a full outer-space military capability, would be a prudent safeguard just in case.

EL MARLBORO MUCHAHO

Joe Cherner: ‘In the United States, placing cigarette ads at every checkout counter is LEGAL. But Wal-Mart doesn’t do it. ‘The health of our U.S. customers is important to us,’ according to a Wal-Mart spokesperson. (Tobacco addiction kills more than 400,000 Americans each year.) But in less developed countries, where customers are less informed, Wal-Mart pushes Marlboro billboards at every checkout counter (for a picture, click here). Wal-Mart also allows Philip Morris to use its parking lots in less developed countries to host Marlboro Adventure Team attractions where young people put on safety harnesses and try out fun and daring outdoor climbing activities. Wal-Mart’s response? As best I can piece together their point of view after months of talking with these folks, it is: ‘The health of our customers in less developed countries is not our top priority.’ But isn’t the health of ALL children important?’

☞ To learn more, click here.

BETTER OFF IN AN ORPHANAGE?

Now here’s a controversial topic – gay adoption. What do you make of the logic in this editorial from the Chicago Tribune?

Post navigation

← He’s . . . Snortling?
Finding the Next Buffett →

Quote of the Day

"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"

David Sarnoff's associates on his advocacy of radio in the 1920s

Subscribe

 Advice

The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need

"So full of tips and angles that only a booby or a billionaire could not benefit." -- The New York Times

Help

MYM Emergency?

Too Much Junk?

Tax Questions?

Ask Less

Recent Posts

  • "PAPERS PLEASE" -- Trump's Very Own Gigantic Police Force

    July 9, 2025
  • 5 Links And A Joke Walk Into A Bar

    July 8, 2025
  • There WAS No Cherry Tree

    July 7, 2025
  • "The Most Popular Bill Ever Signed In The History Of Our Country"

    July 6, 2025
  • Unbelievably Bad -- Literally

    July 4, 2025
  • Repeal The Steal

    July 2, 2025
  • Our Record-High Stock Market

    June 30, 2025
  • Stuffing The Goose

    June 30, 2025
  • Yes! (Plus A Bonus)

    June 29, 2025
  • How Does THAT Make You Feel . . .

    June 27, 2025
Andrew Tobias Books
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
©2025 Andrew Tobias - All Rights Reserved | Website: Whirled Pixels | Author Photo: Tony Adams