Lies And Lawlessness January 26, 2026 Sorry for the strong language, but these 90 seconds make pretty much nail it. Q: Why not let the people of Minneapolis deal with threats to their safety, unless they ask the federal government for help? A: Because the idea is to replace our democracy with Putin-style one-man rule. Timothy Snyder explains how: The Camps, the Executions, and the Future . . . The country stops at the border. And so the law stops at the border. And so for the tyrant an obvious move is to extend the border so that is everywhere, to turn the whole country as a border area, where no rules apply. Stalin did this with border zones and deportations in the 1930s that preceded the Great Terror. Hitler did it with immigration raids in 1938 that targeted undocumented Jews and forced them across the border. And just what is Trump doing now? By his own admission, as well as by the admission of cabinet members, he is using ICE, nominally a border authority, to enforce his own whims on an American state of his choosing. It is not legal to attack a city because its policies work. It is not legal to threaten a state to gain information about its voters. The border becomes the pretext to undo the law everywhere, at all times, and against anyone. It is the crack that can be opened. The wedge is the lie. The lies begin as clichés, memes that are pounded into our heads by the government and by those in the media who repeat them, mindlessly or with malice. One of these cliches is “law enforcement,” which is uttered over and over like an incantation. “Law enforcement” is not a noun. It is not a thing in the world. It is an action. And action is something that we have a right to see and judge for ourselves. People enforcing the law do not wear masks. And people wearing masks who trespass, assault, batter, and kill are not enforcing the law. They are violating it. It is indeed the job of some local, state, and federal authorities to enforce the law. It is a disservice to them when federal employees carry out public executions. It is a greater disservice to them when such actions are defined as “law enforcement.” The lies continue as provocative inversions, as what in On Tyranny I called “dangerous words”: these are, precisely, “terrorist” and “extremist.” These two words are known to us from history as those used by tyrants. And these are the words used by the Trump people to defame those killed by their polices. This is their “messaging,” their banality of evil, as Hannah Arendt called it. Or the evil of banality, as Václav Havel said. Words turned into reality with the complicity of those who hear them. Those who actively lie are directly complicit in the deaths that just happen and in any deaths to come. But those in media who choose to treat propaganda as the story, to begin from lies rather than from events, are also complicit. The border is the crack, the lie is the wedge, and the wedge is made up of people — of us. Words matter, uttered first or repeated. They create an atmosphere, they normalize — or they do not. We can choose to see, to call things by their proper names, to call out people who lie. We have to. The moral horror of those killings is enough. But there is a political logic as well. And the two are connected. Those who resist the lawlessness and the lies are doing right. And they are giving a second chance to the endangered American republic. . . . “The president should be impeached and convicted,” argues Snyder, “as should everyone responsible for these outrages.” Worth sharing in full. A Stark Warning About the 2026 election — it’s not too late to listen to this New Yorker interview with neoconservative policy analyst Robert Kagan. You can skip the first couple of minutes until they introduce him — and perhaps listen at 1.2X or whatever suits you — but listen. And share widely if it strikes you as it has me. Join Indivisible! Support the opposition!