Skip to content
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

  • Home
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Bio
  • Archives
  • Links
  • Me-Mail
Andrew Tobias
Andrew Tobias

Money and Other Subjects

Enough With The Pronouns

March 4, 2025

I got an email from a 78-year-old heterosexual partner in a major law firm whose first name is clearly male.

His signature block specified his pronouns: he/him/his.

The grammarian in me wonders why anyone needs to include the possessive.  Is there an imaginable gender identity that would allow for he/him/hers?

The progressive in me believes that most people who specify their pronouns, though wonderfully well-intentioned, should stop.

I can think of only two reasons to specify pronouns.

1. To provide needed guidance, which the world should be grateful for and enthusiastically respect.

This makes total sense.

In most cases, however, guidance is not needed.

Most people identify as — and are readily identifiable as — men or women.

So the only reason for them to specify their pronouns is . . .

2. To signal support.

Which is a beautiful thing but which raises this question:

Does the comfort it provides our gender-nonconforming brethren outweigh the discomfort it may cause good people who are not yet at ease with gender-nonconformity?

I want to win elections — not least to help protect the gender-nonconforming, who do not fare well in MAGA land or autocratic states like Russia and North Korea (our latest allies at the U.N.).

By specifying pronouns when they’re not needed, we signal that we think everyone should — that specifying pronouns is what all enlightened people do.

It kind of says (not literally, of course, but subtly): Democrats do this, Republicans don’t.  (Well?  Do you know Republicans who specify their pronouns?)

If we controlled one or two branches of government, and if the Republican Party had not become the party of the Proud Boys and autocracy, I might feel differently.

But when so much is at stake, I think we should avoid signaling to millions of good people that they really don’t fit in with us.  Because on almost every policy that matters to them — from health care to the economy to climate, from taxing billionaires to sensible gun safety to not pardoning cop-beaters — we are exactly the party they fit in with. 



BONUS

Did you see Heather Cox Richardson’s recent post? 


“Putin is on the inside now.”


It is so worth reading in full.

 

Post navigation

← What To DO . . . And Krasnov — Really?
It’s Not A State of the Union It’s A . . . →

Quote of the Day

"What's so fair about eliminating the interest deduction on your first car but not on your second home?"

Murray Weidenbaum

Subscribe

 Advice

The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need

"So full of tips and angles that only a booby or a billionaire could not benefit." -- The New York Times

Help

MYM Emergency?

Too Much Junk?

Tax Questions?

Ask Less

Recent Posts

  • Doug, Simon, Dave, John, Caitlan, And Pete -- I'm A Fan

    May 8, 2025
  • Fair Harvard

    May 7, 2025
  • Your Future Imaginary Friend

    May 5, 2025
  • Conservative Peggy And Liberal Thom

    May 4, 2025
  • Little Marco Predicts

    May 3, 2025
  • May Day! May Day!

    May 3, 2025
  • Rising Prices, Falling Poll Numbers, See You Tomorrow

    April 29, 2025
  • He's Having A Lot Of Fun

    April 29, 2025
  • A Word from the Wise

    April 26, 2025
  • The Huge, Crucial Difference Between Neville Chamberlain And Donald Trump

    April 24, 2025
Andrew Tobias Books
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
©2025 Andrew Tobias - All Rights Reserved | Website: Whirled Pixels | Author Photo: Tony Adams